<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Code Reading on Vedant Andhale</title>
    <link>https://www.vedant.me/tags/code-reading/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Code Reading on Vedant Andhale</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.vedant.me/tags/code-reading/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Read one request through an unfamiliar codebase</title>
      <link>https://www.vedant.me/notebook/reading-a-codebase-you-did-not-write/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.vedant.me/notebook/reading-a-codebase-you-did-not-write/</guid>
      <description>A focused way to build a useful map of a repository without reading every file first.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opening every folder is a slow way to understand a codebase. The directory tree tells you where code lives; it rarely tells you which parts matter for the behaviour you are trying to change.</p>
<p>Start with one concrete action. For an API, choose a request with a small input and an observable result. Find its route, follow the call into the service layer, and identify where it reads or writes state.</p>
<h2 id="build-a-map-of-boundaries">Build a map of boundaries</h2>
<p>Write down the entry point, validation, business decision, persistence and response. You are looking for responsibility changes rather than collecting every function name.</p>
<p>The FreightSense repository, for example, has an evaluation route that connects deterministic calculations, an LLM call and a database record. Reading that path explains more about the application than reading unrelated utilities alphabetically.</p>
<p>Next, follow one failure path. What happens if the external service times out? Does the request fail, use a fallback, or enqueue work? That path often reveals assumptions that the successful example keeps hidden.</p>
<h2 id="use-tests-and-history-selectively">Use tests and history selectively</h2>
<p>Tests near the behaviour can show the expected contract, although a test may also encode an old assumption. Configuration reveals which dependencies and feature choices change the runtime. Git history helps when a seemingly strange branch of code has a reason that the current file no longer explains.</p>
<p>Keep a short list of unresolved questions: where an identifier comes from, whether a write is transactional, or which worker owns retries. Answer the ones relevant to your change first.</p>
<p>You do not need complete understanding before making progress. You need a reliable account of the path you are touching, its neighbours, and the evidence that a change preserves the intended behaviour.</p>
<p>Example repository: <a href="https://github.com/VedantAndhale/FreightSense">FreightSense</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
